Gender differences in self-attributions: Relationship of gender to attributional consistency, style, and expectations for performance in a college course

Citation
Cr. Campbell et Jw. Henry, Gender differences in self-attributions: Relationship of gender to attributional consistency, style, and expectations for performance in a college course, SEX ROLES, 41(1-2), 1999, pp. 95-104
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
SEX ROLES
ISSN journal
03600025 → ACNP
Volume
41
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
95 - 104
Database
ISI
SICI code
0360-0025(199907)41:1-2<95:GDISRO>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Results are reported for a study of college students that examined gender d ifferences in the consistency of attributions over time, in general attribu tional style, and in specific explanations for performance in a course. Bot h genders demonstrated consistency over time. There was no difference ill g eneral attributional style by gender and there was no difference in specifi c attributions for course performance by gender combined with accuracy in p redicting performance. However, there was a difference in The explanations for performance selected by men versus women and in the explanations for pe rformance selected by those students who accurately predicted their own per formance versus inaccurate predictors. The sample was comprised of 113 men and 94 women; mostly in the 21 to 24 age range (108), followed by the 17 to 20 age range (78), the 24 to 27 range (16), 27 to 30 range (3) and the old er than 30 range (2). The sample was mostly Caucasian (176), followed by As ian (13), African American (8), Hispanic (7), Other (2), and missing data ( I). Most students were business majors (180), with 21 other majors and 6 mi ssing data. Implications of these results are discussed in this article.