Adverse selection is often blamed for crop insurance indemnities exceeding
premiums plus subsidies. However, nationwide empirical evidence has been la
cking or based on inadequate county-level data. This article uses nationwid
e farm-level data on corn and soybeans to decompose incentives for particip
ation in U.S, multiple peril crop insurance into a risk-aversion incentive
(the conventional justification for insurance), an actuarial or subsidy inc
entive (reflecting government subsidization), and an asymmetric information
incentive (which reflects farmers' information advantage). Results show th
at the risk-aversion incentive is small. Farmers participate in crop insura
nce primarily to receive the subsidy or because of adverse selection possib
ilities.