Upper arm arteriovenous fistulas as a reliable access alternative for patients requiring chronic hemodialysis

Citation
Ck. Livingston et Jr. Potts, Upper arm arteriovenous fistulas as a reliable access alternative for patients requiring chronic hemodialysis, AM SURG, 65(11), 1999, pp. 1038-1042
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
AMERICAN SURGEON
ISSN journal
00031348 → ACNP
Volume
65
Issue
11
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1038 - 1042
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-1348(199911)65:11<1038:UAAFAA>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
The wrist fistula is the access procedure of choice in the hemodialysis pat ient. However, unavailable or unusable anatomy in this aging population has made them difficult to establish. This study retrospectively compares pate ncy, occlusion, and complication rates of upper arm arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) as a reliable alternative. Fifty-eight upper arm AVFs were created i n 52 patients between February 1995 and August 1997 at Hermann Hospital, af filiated with the University of Texas Health Science Center in Houston, Tex as. Fistulas were constructed using the brachial artery (BA) side-to-end (n = 56) or side-to-side (n = 1) with either the cephalic vein (CV; n = 39), transposed basilic vein (TBV; n = 16), or other vein [basilic vein (BV; n = 1), transposed cephalic vein (TCV; n = 1), median cubital vein (MCV; n = 1 )]. One-year primary patency rates for upper arm AVFs were 66 per cent, and secondary patency rates were 22 per cent. Flow rates averaged 354.6 mL/min ute. Primary and secondary patency rates for fistulas created are: BA-CV (6 7% and 20%), BA-TBV (63% and 25%), and other upper arm AVFs 66 per cent wit hout revisions. Primary patencies for both BA-CV and BA-TBV fistulas were s imilar to previously reported studies. Secondary patencies proved to be les s effective. Upper arm AVFs should be considered before graft placement whe n wrist and forearm anatomy does not lend itself to fistula creation.