How selfish is a cuckoo chick?

Citation
Rm. Kilner et Nb. Davies, How selfish is a cuckoo chick?, ANIM BEHAV, 58, 1999, pp. 797-808
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences","Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
ISSN journal
00033472 → ACNP
Volume
58
Year of publication
1999
Part
4
Pages
797 - 808
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-3472(199910)58:<797:HSIACC>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
We studied the begging display of nestling cuckoos, Cuculus canorus, reared by reed warbler, Acrocephalus scirpaceus, hosts, to test various hypothese s for the cuckoo's unusually rapid begging call. The hypotheses are not mut ually exclusive but focus on different parts of the chain: chick need-beggi ng signals-provisioning by hosts. We reject two hypotheses. (1) Cuckoo chic ks do not use their exaggerated begging to counteract host rejection: beggi ng displays varied with hunger and functioned entirely to solicit-food. (2) Cuckoos also do not exaggerate their begging calls simply because they nee d more food than a host brood. Single cuckoos grew at a similar rate to a b rood of four reed warblers, and more slowly than a blackbird, Turdus merula , chick (a nonparasitic chick of similar size). Our data support two other hypotheses. (3) To elicit sufficient care in reed warbler nests, the cuckoo must exaggerate the vocal component of its display to compensate for its d eficient visual signal (a single gape) compared with a host brood. Thus rap id calling reflects the way the cuckoo exploits the provisioning rules that hosts use to feed their own young. (4) In theory, cuckoos should be more s elfish than host young because their greed is unconstrained by kinship. Our data are equivocal; compared with host broods, cuckoos solicited a higher provisioning rate in relation to one measure of need but not for another. W e discuss whether cuckoos are likely to have gens-specific begging displays . (C) 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.