History and physical examination to estimate the risk of ectopic pregnancy: Validation of a clinical prediction model

Citation
Rg. Buckley et al., History and physical examination to estimate the risk of ectopic pregnancy: Validation of a clinical prediction model, ANN EMERG M, 34(5), 1999, pp. 589-594
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
01960644 → ACNP
Volume
34
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
589 - 594
Database
ISI
SICI code
0196-0644(199911)34:5<589:HAPETE>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Study objective: To prospectively validate a clinical prediction model for ectopic pregnancy (EP). Methods: Prospective cohort with 14-month derivation and 12-month validatio n phases. All hemodynamically stable, first-trimester patients with abdomin al pain or vaginal bleeding who presented to a military teaching hospital e mergency department underwent follow-up until an outcome of intrauterine pr egnancy (IUP) or EP was established. Patients were separated into the high- risk group, defined as having either peritoneal signs or definite cervical motion tenderness; intermediate-risk group, defined as the presence of pain or tenderness, other than midline cramping, plus absence of fetal heart to nes, and absence of tissue visible at the cervical os; and low-risk group ( neither high- nor intermediate-risk) using recursive partitioning. Results: Summarizing both phases, 915 patients had 845 (93%) IUPs and 70 (7 .6%) EPs, with 18 (1.9%) lost to follow-up. The clinical prediction model c lassified 75 (8.2%) into the highrisk group (sensitivity 31%, 95% confidenc e interval [CI] 21% to 44%; specificity 94%, 95% CI 92% to 95%); and 644 (7 0%) in the intermediate-risk group (sensitivity 98%, 95% CI 89% to 100%; sp ecificity 25%, 95% CI 22% to 29%). The remaining 196 (21%) patients who met neither high-risk nor intermediate-risk criteria were classified into the low-risk group. On the basis of EP prevalence of 7.7%, the risk of EP was l ess than 1% (95% CI 0% to 3%) for the low-risk group, 7% (95% CI 5% to 10%) for the intermediate-risk group, and 29% (95% CI 19% to 41%) for the high- risk group. Conclusion: This clinical prediction model is useful for estimating the ris k of EP in first-trimester patients, particularly when ancillary testing is equivocal or not readily available.