Rg. Buckley et al., History and physical examination to estimate the risk of ectopic pregnancy: Validation of a clinical prediction model, ANN EMERG M, 34(5), 1999, pp. 589-594
Study objective: To prospectively validate a clinical prediction model for
ectopic pregnancy (EP).
Methods: Prospective cohort with 14-month derivation and 12-month validatio
n phases. All hemodynamically stable, first-trimester patients with abdomin
al pain or vaginal bleeding who presented to a military teaching hospital e
mergency department underwent follow-up until an outcome of intrauterine pr
egnancy (IUP) or EP was established. Patients were separated into the high-
risk group, defined as having either peritoneal signs or definite cervical
motion tenderness; intermediate-risk group, defined as the presence of pain
or tenderness, other than midline cramping, plus absence of fetal heart to
nes, and absence of tissue visible at the cervical os; and low-risk group (
neither high- nor intermediate-risk) using recursive partitioning.
Results: Summarizing both phases, 915 patients had 845 (93%) IUPs and 70 (7
.6%) EPs, with 18 (1.9%) lost to follow-up. The clinical prediction model c
lassified 75 (8.2%) into the highrisk group (sensitivity 31%, 95% confidenc
e interval [CI] 21% to 44%; specificity 94%, 95% CI 92% to 95%); and 644 (7
0%) in the intermediate-risk group (sensitivity 98%, 95% CI 89% to 100%; sp
ecificity 25%, 95% CI 22% to 29%). The remaining 196 (21%) patients who met
neither high-risk nor intermediate-risk criteria were classified into the
low-risk group. On the basis of EP prevalence of 7.7%, the risk of EP was l
ess than 1% (95% CI 0% to 3%) for the low-risk group, 7% (95% CI 5% to 10%)
for the intermediate-risk group, and 29% (95% CI 19% to 41%) for the high-
risk group.
Conclusion: This clinical prediction model is useful for estimating the ris
k of EP in first-trimester patients, particularly when ancillary testing is
equivocal or not readily available.