Section 34 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 was enacted in
the face of considerable opposition. it is contended that the evidence yie
lded by the provision is of insufficient importance to justify the problems
it causes. Section 34 has proved complex in operation, despite the best ef
forts of appellate courts to simplify the issues for trial judge and jury.
IS, as seems likely, it is also susceptible to challenge under the European
Convention on Human Rights, the time may be near when we should cut our lo
sses and revert to the common law rules.