Cardiac output can be reliably measured noninvasively after coronary artery bypass grafting operation

Citation
T. Koobi et al., Cardiac output can be reliably measured noninvasively after coronary artery bypass grafting operation, CRIT CARE M, 27(10), 1999, pp. 2206-2211
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00903493 → ACNP
Volume
27
Issue
10
Year of publication
1999
Pages
2206 - 2211
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-3493(199910)27:10<2206:COCBRM>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the reliability of whole-body impedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output after coronary artery bypass grafting operation in comparison with the thermodilution method. Design:Prospective, consecutive sampling. Patients: A total of 82 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery were investigated. In a group of 41 patients who were intubated, cardiac ou tput measurements were taken simultaneously with whole-body impedance cardi ography and the thermodilution method within the first 3 hrs after the oper ation (early intensive care unit [ICU] period). In another group of 41 pati ents, the measurements were taken before the operation and in the second 12 hrs after cardiac surgery (late ICU period). Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results:The agreement between the thermodilution and whole-body impedance cardiography cardiac output measurements was good befo re the operation, bias 0.04 +/- 1.64 L/min (n = 41), and in the late ICU pe riod, bias 0.00 +/- 1.84 L/min (+/-2 so) (0 = 41). The results were within 20% in 81%-85% of the cases. The agreement was satisfactory in the early IC U period, bias 0.38 +/- 2.74 L/min (n = 41). It was presumed that thermal i nstability of the patients was one possible source of measurement errors in the thermodilution method, causing reduced agreement between the methods i n this period. The repeatability values (rv = 2.83 x SDs) for whole-body im pedance cardiography were 0.44 L/min before the operation, 0.30 L/min in th e early ICU period, and 0.65 L/min in the late ICU period, being significan tly better than for the thermodilution method (0.79, 0.51, and 1.11 L/min, respectively) in all phases of the investigation (p < .001). The agreement between the thermodilution method and whole-body impedance cardiography is similar to reported comparisons between invasive methods in analogous setti ngs. Conclusions: Whole-body impedance cardiography reliably measures cardiac ou tput in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting operation. The excel lent repeatability of whole-body impedance cardiography enhances the value of the method in continuous monitoring of patients after the operation.