CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF DURAFLO(R)-II HEPARIN TREATED EXTRACORPOREAL-CIRCULATION CIRCUITS (2ND VERSION) - THE EUROPEAN WORKING GROUP ON HEPARIN COATED EXTRACORPOREAL-CIRCULATION CIRCUITS
Crh. Wildevuur et al., CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF DURAFLO(R)-II HEPARIN TREATED EXTRACORPOREAL-CIRCULATION CIRCUITS (2ND VERSION) - THE EUROPEAN WORKING GROUP ON HEPARIN COATED EXTRACORPOREAL-CIRCULATION CIRCUITS, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 11(4), 1997, pp. 616-623
Objectives: To evaluate whether the application of heparin treated cir
cuits for elective coronary artery surgery improves postoperative reco
very, a European multicenter randomised clinical trial was carried out
. Methods: In Il European heart centers. 805 low-risk patients underwe
nt cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with either an untreated circuit (n =
407) or an identical but heparin treated circuit (n = 398, Duraflu(R)I
I). Results: Significant differences were found among participating ce
nters with respect to patient characteristics. blood handling procedur
es and postoperative care. The use of heparin treated circuits reveale
d no overall changes in blood loss, blood use, time on ventilator, occ
urrence of adverse events: morbidity, mortality, and intensive care st
ay. These results did not change after adjustment for centers and (oth
er) prognostic factors as analysed with logistic regression. In both g
roups no clinical or technical (patient or device related) side effect
s were reported. Because Female gender and aortic cross clamp lime app
eared as prognostic factors in the logistic regression analysis, a sub
group analysis with these variables was performed. In a subpopulation
of females (n = 99), those receiving heparin treated circuits needed l
ess blood products, had a lower incidence of rhythm disturbances and w
ere extubated earlier than controls. In another subgroup of patients w
ith aortic cross clamp time exceeding 60 min (n = 197), the amount of
patients requiring prolonged intensive care treatment (> 24 h) was sig
nificantly lower when they received heparin treated circuits versus co
ntrols. Conclusion: These findings suggest that improved recovery can
be expected with heparin treated circuits in specific higher risk pati
ent populations (e.g. females) and when prolonged aortic cross clamp t
ime is anticipated. Further investigations are recommended to analyse
the clinical benefit of heparin treated circuits in studies with patie
nts in different well defined risk categories and under better standar
dised circumstances. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.