The aim of the present study was to investigate how spatial attention
influences directional manual and saccadic reaction times. Two experim
ents were carried out. In experiment 1 subjects were instructed to per
form pointing responses toward targets that were located either in the
same or the opposite hemifield with respect to the hemifield in which
an imperative stimulus was presented. In experiment 2, they were inst
ructed to make saccadic or pointing responses. The direction of the re
sponses was indicated by the shape of the imperative stimulus. Reactio
n time (RT), movement time, and, in experiment 2, saccadic trajectory
were measured. The imperative stimulus location was either cued (endog
enous attention) or uncued. In the latter case the imperative stimulus
presentation attracted attention (exogenous attention). The main resu
lts of the experiments were the following: First, exogenous attention
markedly decreased the RTs when the required movement was directed tow
ard the imperative stimulus location. This directional effect was much
stronger for pointing than for ocular responses. Second, endogenously
allocated attention did not influence differentially RTs of pointing
responses directed toward or away the attended hemifield. In contrast,
endogenous attention markedly favored the saccadic responses when mad
e away from the cued hemifield. Third, regardless of cueing, the direc
tion of movement affected both pointing and saccadic reaction times. S
accadic reaction times were faster when the required movement was dire
cted upward, while manual reaction times were faster when the movement
was directed downward. Fourth, lateralized spatial attention deviated
the trajectory of the saccades contralateral to the attention locatio
n. This pattern of results supports the notion that spatial attention
depends on the activation of the same sensorimotor circuits that progr
am actions in space.