OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an "optional" vaginal delivery rate and nov
el delivery score would provide informative profiles of intrapartum care.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective survey of all: parturients delivering between Jan
uary and December 1996. Deliveries were categorized as standard-vaginal (V-
S), optional-vaginal (V-O), standard-cesarean (C-S) or pote ntially avoidab
le-cesarean (C-PA) using specific perinatal criteria derived from the liter
ature. A weighted equation was developed and applied, generating physician
delivery scores, giving "extra credit" for V-O and a "debit" for C-PA: deli
very score = [(%V-O x 2) + (%V-S) - (%C-PA)] x 100.
RESULTS: V-O rates and delivery scores ranged from 0% to 25% and from 52 to
113, respectively (medians of 9.8% and 92.9). Among the obstetricians (n =
38), a significant inverse correlation was noted between the total C-S rate
s and V-O rates (r=-.54, P<.005). The maternal-fetal medicine physicians (n
= 6) had high total C-S rates (22-36%) but also had high V-O rates (17.1-2
3.5%) and high delivery scores (82.1-101.5).
CONCLUSION: The optional vaginal delivery rate and delivery score are more-
informative indicators of intrapartum management acumen than is cesarean se
clion rate alone. We suggest incorporating these descriptors into departmen
tal qualify assurance programs.