Antepartum and postpartum Papanicolaou smears - Are they both necessary?

Citation
A. Jazayeri et al., Antepartum and postpartum Papanicolaou smears - Are they both necessary?, J REPRO MED, 44(10), 1999, pp. 879-882
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00247758 → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
10
Year of publication
1999
Pages
879 - 882
Database
ISI
SICI code
0024-7758(199910)44:10<879:AAPPS->2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine if a Papanicolaou smear performed during pregnancy needs to be repeated at the postpartum visit. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was performed on women who recei ved prenatal care from our obstetric clinic and returned for a postpartum v isit. All pregnant women who had both a Papanicolaou smear in pregnancy and another at the postpartum visit, about six weeks after delivery, were incl uded. Six hundred one patients were studied who had complete records betwee n 1995 and 1996. RESULTS: The average length of time between the two smears was 209 days. Wi th the exception of a lower frequency of the presence of endocervical cells in the antepartum Papanicolaou smears, there were no differences between t he distribution of Papanicolaou smear results. In patients without risk fac tors and a normal antepartum Papanicolaou smear, the prevalence of squamous intraepithelial lesion on the postpartum smear was very low (4 in 1,000). CONCLUSION: In patients without risk factors for cervical intraepithelial n eoplasia and a normal Papanicolaou smear in pregnancy, a Papanicolaou smear should be repeated at the recommended yearly interval.