J. Trachtenberg et al., Microwave thermoablation for localized prostate cancer after failed radiation therapy: Role of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, MOL UROL, 3(3), 1999, pp. 247-250
The treatment of residual prostate cancer after irradiation is often associ
ated with significant morbidity and a high failure rate. Percutaneous trans
perineal interstitial microwave thermoablation is a minimally invasive proc
edure used experimentally in our institution to treat selected patients wit
h failures of external-beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer. The aim
is to ablate all residual intraprostatic cancer thermally. Patients were tr
eated under general or epidural anesthesia with transrectal ultrasound guid
ance of transperineal placement of the microwave antennas. The rectum, uret
hra, and a developed space between the prostate and surrounding tissues wer
e actively cooled. The minimal target temperature of the prostate was 65 de
grees C for 15 min. The temperature was measured in all cases with intersti
tial prostatic thermosensors and in selected cases with online magnetic res
onance scanning. Thirty-seven patients with apparently localized prostate c
ancer after failure of treatment for cure with external-beam therapy were s
ubjected to this treatment, and 20 of these patients have at least 12 month
s of follow-up. The initial prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentration r
anged from 0.2 to 120 ng/mL. At 12 months, 12 of 20 patients had no biochem
ical or histologic evidence of disease, and 11 of 14 patients with initial
PSA concentration <10 ng/mL had no evidence of disease. Five of the thirty-
seven patients were treated with 3 months of neoadjuvant androgen ablation
because the volume of their prostates precluded adequate heating. The avera
ge volume decline was 28%, which allowed all men to be treated. Two of thes
e patients have been followed for at lease 1 year, and neither shows eviden
ce of recurrence. Side effects of treatment in all patients were modest. Pr
eliminary results suggest that this treatment might be useful in selected p
atients as a salvage therapy after failure of radiation therapy for localiz
ed prostate cancer.