The possibility of empirically correcting a nonlinear dynamical model is ex
amined. The empirical correction is constructed by fitting a first-order Ma
rkov model to the forecast errors using initial conditions as predictors. T
he dynamical operator of the Markov model can then be subtracted from the o
riginal forecast model to correct the forecast. The procedure is based an a
n earlier work by Leith, suitably modified for practical applications. The
effects of analysis errors and finite difference approximations are analyze
d. It is shown that uncorrelated analysis errors produce spurious terms in
the empirical correction operator that act to damp eddy variance at a rate
inversely proportional to the lead time used to estimate the Markov model.
The finite difference approximation is appropriate as long as the forecast
errors grow linearly with lead time. These restrictions can be interpreted
as setting lower and upper limits on the lead time, respectively, and can b
e checked without knowing the true state exactly. The procedure is sensitiv
e to sampling errors, but this problem was not explored.
These formal conclusions are tested on a nonlinear quasigeostrophic model i
n which model error is created by changing the model parameters. A "systema
tic error" correction, which does not depend on state and is herd constant
throughout the integration, does not improve the forecast skin of the model
because the contrived error is primarily state dependent. However, an empi
rical correction, which depends on instantaneous state, improves the foreca
st skill of the model by 10 days, and further iterations extend the skill t
o the limit imposed by observation error (about 20 days in this example).