Ventricular anatomy and shunt catheters

Citation
Ba. Kaufman et Ts. Park, Ventricular anatomy and shunt catheters, PED NEUROS, 31(1), 1999, pp. 1-6
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics
Journal title
PEDIATRIC NEUROSURGERY
ISSN journal
10162291 → ACNP
Volume
31
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1 - 6
Database
ISI
SICI code
1016-2291(199907)31:1<1:VAASC>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
A functioning shunt must have a patent proximal catheter within the cerebro spinal fluid space. Occlusion with choroid plexus or ependymal tissue might be expected if these tissues are in contact with the proximal inlets. This study was undertaken to define the intraventricular distances available fo r a standard-placement shunt cather and to compare the available distances with actual ventricular catheter inlets. in 52 normal subjects (age range f rom 1 month to 20 years; median 7.7 years) magnetic resonance imaging was u sed to measure the dimensions of the anterior horn in planes typically used for cather placement. For anterior placements, the intraventricular length (ventricle entry to the foramen of Monro) was measured for a standardized catheter route ('As') and for a route yielding a maximum lenght ('Amax'). F or posterior placements, the length (ventricle tip to foramen of Monro) was obtained for a standardized catheter placement to the ipsilateral ('Pi') a nd the contra lateral ventricle ('Pc') as well as measuring a maximum lengt h in a curved trajectory ('Pmax'). The average length (and range) in centim eters for the various trajectories was: As = 1.5 (1.4-1.9), Amax = 1.7 (1.2 -2.2), Pi = 1.6 (1.2-2.1), Pc = 2.0 (1.4-2.9), and Pmax = 2.8/3.1 (2.1-3.6) . Minor variations from a standard shunt insertion site did not affect the length of catheter within the ventricle. Current ventricular catheters have proximal inlets extending 1.6-2.4 cm from the catheter tip. Variations in standard ventricular catheter placement should have no measurable effect on how much ventricle is available for the proximal catheter. It may not be p ossible to place a standard ventricular catheter and keep the inlets within the ventricle and placed consistently away from choroid plexus and ependym a, regardless of approach. This may contribute to the similar proximal occl usion rates reported for the differing placements. Subsequent studies of sh unt placement should correlate proximal occlusion rates with ventricular si ze. To prevent ventricular size from directly affecting proximal conclusion , consideration should be given to altering the design of ventricular cathe ters by placing inlets over a shorter distance (1.0 cm) from the tip.