All bisphosphonates are similar in terms of their inhibitory effects on bon
e resorption, but seems to have different effects on inflammatory precesses
. For example, clodronate and tiludronate have anti-inflammatory and antiar
thritic activity in animals, while aminobisphosphonates exacerbate experime
ntal arthritis in mice. Further, aminobisphosphonate induce acute phase res
ponse in patients, while non-aminobisphosphonates do not. During the last f
ew years, we have explored the effects of various bisphosphonates on the in
flammatory processes in activated macrophages in vitro.
Clodronate and tiludronate can inhibit proinflammatory cytokine and nitric
oxide (NO) secretion from macrophages. In contrast, alendronate and ibandro
nate enhances the secretion of IL- 1 beta and IL-6. The intracellular deliv
ery, and, consequently, the effects of bisphosphonates on inflammatory resp
onses in macrophages are considerably increased by the encapsulation of the
drugs in liposomes.
Clodronate and tiludronate are metabolised to an ATP-analogue by mammalian
cells, while aminobisphosphonates (alendronate, ibandronate) are not. The l
iposome-encapsulated ATP-analogue of clodronate (AppCCl(2)p) exerts similar
effects as clodronate itself on proinflammatory cytokine and NO secretion
from macrophages. In macrophages,the production of cytokines and NO is regu
lated by transcription factors, such as nuclear factor KB (NF-KB). In accor
dance with the effects on cytokine and NO secretion, clodronate and AppCCl(
2)p inhibit the nuclear localization of NF-kappa B in activated macrophages
, while alendronate enhances it.
The data thus strongly suggest that bisphosphonates can be grouped into tho
se that are metabolised by macrophages and that are capable of inhibiting i
nflammatory responses in macrophages, thus having potential anti-inflammato
ry action, and those that are not metabolised and are not anti-inflammatory
.