UNFAVORABLE MECHANICAL EFFECTS OF HEAT AND MOISTURE EXCHANGERS IN VENTILATED PATIENTS

Citation
Ga. Iotti et al., UNFAVORABLE MECHANICAL EFFECTS OF HEAT AND MOISTURE EXCHANGERS IN VENTILATED PATIENTS, Intensive care medicine, 23(4), 1997, pp. 399-405
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care
Journal title
ISSN journal
03424642
Volume
23
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
399 - 405
Database
ISI
SICI code
0342-4642(1997)23:4<399:UMEOHA>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Objective:To investigate the mechanical effects of artificial noses. S etting: A general intensive care unit of a university hospital. Patien ts: 10 patients in pressure support ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Interventions: The following three conditions were randomly t ested on each patient: the use of a heated humidifier (control conditi on), the use of a heat and moisture exchanger without filtering functi on (HME), and the use of a combined heat and moisture exchanger and me chanical filter (HMEF). The pressure support level was automatically a dapted by means of a closed-loop control in order to obtain constancy, throughout the study, of patient inspiratory effort as evaluated from airway occlusion pressure at 0.1 s (P-0.1). Patient's ventilatory pat tern, P-0.1, work of breathing, and blood gases were recorded. Measure ments and main results: The artificial noses increased different compo nents of the inspiratory load: inspiratory resistance, ventilation req uirements (due to increased dead space ventilation), and dynamic intri nsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The additional load impo sed by the artificial noses was entirely undertaken by the ventilator, being the closed-loop control of P-0.1 effective to maintain constanc y of patient inspiratory work by means of adequate increases in pressu re support level. Conclusions: The artificial noses cause unfavorable mechanical effects by increasing inspiratory resistance, ventilation r equirements, and dynamic intrinsic PEEP. Clinicians should consider th ese effects when setting mechanical ventilation and when assessing pat ients' ability to breathe spontaneously.