Ga. Iotti et al., UNFAVORABLE MECHANICAL EFFECTS OF HEAT AND MOISTURE EXCHANGERS IN VENTILATED PATIENTS, Intensive care medicine, 23(4), 1997, pp. 399-405
Objective:To investigate the mechanical effects of artificial noses. S
etting: A general intensive care unit of a university hospital. Patien
ts: 10 patients in pressure support ventilation for acute respiratory
failure. Interventions: The following three conditions were randomly t
ested on each patient: the use of a heated humidifier (control conditi
on), the use of a heat and moisture exchanger without filtering functi
on (HME), and the use of a combined heat and moisture exchanger and me
chanical filter (HMEF). The pressure support level was automatically a
dapted by means of a closed-loop control in order to obtain constancy,
throughout the study, of patient inspiratory effort as evaluated from
airway occlusion pressure at 0.1 s (P-0.1). Patient's ventilatory pat
tern, P-0.1, work of breathing, and blood gases were recorded. Measure
ments and main results: The artificial noses increased different compo
nents of the inspiratory load: inspiratory resistance, ventilation req
uirements (due to increased dead space ventilation), and dynamic intri
nsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The additional load impo
sed by the artificial noses was entirely undertaken by the ventilator,
being the closed-loop control of P-0.1 effective to maintain constanc
y of patient inspiratory work by means of adequate increases in pressu
re support level. Conclusions: The artificial noses cause unfavorable
mechanical effects by increasing inspiratory resistance, ventilation r
equirements, and dynamic intrinsic PEEP. Clinicians should consider th
ese effects when setting mechanical ventilation and when assessing pat
ients' ability to breathe spontaneously.