QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATION OF ERRORS IN THE INDICATOR DILUTION MEASUREMENT OF EXTRAVASCULAR LUNG WATER

Citation
Cjb. Wallin et al., QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATION OF ERRORS IN THE INDICATOR DILUTION MEASUREMENT OF EXTRAVASCULAR LUNG WATER, Intensive care medicine, 23(4), 1997, pp. 469-475
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care
Journal title
ISSN journal
03424642
Volume
23
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
469 - 475
Database
ISI
SICI code
0342-4642(1997)23:4<469:QEOEIT>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Objective: To assess the accuracy of the diffusible indicators heavy w ater and thermal indicator in the measurement of extravascular lung wa ter (EVLW). Design: Cardiac output (GO), mean transit time and EVLW fo r the two diffusible indicators were measured. CO for indocyanine gree n, gravimetric EVLW and the calculated mean transit time for a diffusi ble indicator were used as independent reference variables. CO, mean t ransit time and EVLW for the two diffusible indicators were compared t o the reference variables and the percentage error for each measured v ariable was calculated for each bolus injection. Setting: 6 sheep with healthy lungs and 6 with pulmonary oedema in a research laboratory. I nterventions: CO was altered with positive end-expiratory pressure and dobutamine. Measurements: All indicators were given together in a bol us through a central venous line. Indicators were detected simultaneou sly in the aorta, and CO, mean transit time and EVLW were measured. EV LW was measured gravimetrically (EVLWgrav) postmortem. Results: In the combination of a low CO and a large distribution volume, heavy water and thermal indicator produced a large number of slow wash-out curves. These curves were abolished from further analysis. The mean errors in CO and mean transit time for heavy water were close to zero and indep endent of the distribution volume; the product EVLW was close to EVLWg rav. The mean error in thermodilution CO measured in the aorta was clo se to zero but dependent on the distribution volume. The mean error in mean transit time for the thermal indicator was 36 % and dependent on the distribution volume. Their product EVLW overestimated EVLWgrav by 70 %. Conclusions: The results obtained for heavy water confirmed the theoretical basis of the indicator dilution method. The mean transit time for the thermal indicator was not proportionate to its distributi on volume. The magnitude of this error prevents the calculation of an anatomically defined EVLW using a catheter-mounted thermistor in the a orta.