Proteins can he very tolerant to amino acid substitution, even within their
core. Understanding the factors responsible for this behavior is of critic
al importance for protein engineering and design. Mutations in proteins hav
e been quantified in terms of the changes in stability they induce. For exa
mple, guest residues in specific secondary structures have been used as pro
bes of conformational preferences of amino acids, yielding propensity scale
s. Predicting these amino acid propensities would be a good test of any new
potential energy functions used to mimic protein stability. We have recent
ly developed a protein design procedure that optimizes whale sequences for
a given target conformation based on the knowledge of the template backbone
and on a semiempirical potential energy function. This energy function is
purely physical, including steric interactions based on a Lennard-Jones pot
ential, electrostatics based on a Coulomb potential, and hydrophobicity in
the form of an environment free energy based on accessible surface area and
interatomic: contact areas. Sequences designed by this procedure for 10 di
fferent proteins were analyzed to extract conformational preferences for am
ino acids. The resulting structure-based propensity scales show significant
agreements with experimental propensity scale values, both for cr-helices
and P-sheets. These results indicate that amino acid conformational prefere
nces are a natural consequence of the potential energy we use. This confirm
s the accuracy of our potential and indicates that such preferences should
not be added as a design criterion.