Js. Robinson et M. Sivapalan, AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE PHYSICAL CAUSES OF SCALING AND HETEROGENEITY OF REGIONAL FLOOD FREQUENCY, Water resources research, 33(5), 1997, pp. 1045-1059
Peak discharge data from catchments in the central Appalachian region
of eastern United States suggest that the coefficient of variation of
annual flood peaks, CV[Q], is not constant, as implied by the index fl
ood method but Varies with catchment size in a complex manner [Smith,
1992]. Gupta et al. [1994] have interpreted the data as indicating tha
t for catchments smaller than a critical threshold size, CV[Q] increas
es with increasing catchment size, while for larger catchments CV[Q] d
ecreases with catchment size. Our analysis of the same discharge data
suggests further that the spatial heterogeneity of these flood frequen
cy characteristics, for example, mean annual flood, E[Q], and coeffici
ent of variation, CV[Q], between catchments in the region is also not
constant but varies systematically with catchment size. The spatial he
terogeneity of E[Q] appears to decrease with catchment size, while het
erogeneity of CV[Q] appears to mirror the observed scaling behavior of
CV[Q]. These observations have been made based on statistical analysi
s of empirical flood data without being underpinned by a physical theo
ry to explain them. In this paper, motivated by these observations and
by the need for a physical theory of regional flood frequency, we dev
elop a simple derived flood frequency model. On the basis of insights
provided by the model, we relate the increase of CV[Q] with catchment
size for small catchments (smaller than a threshold size) to the scali
ng behavior of the ratio of storm duration to catchment response time.
On the other hand, we connect the decrease of CV[Q] with catchment si
ze for larger catchments to the spatial scaling of rainfall (excess) i
ntensity. Our simple model also permits us to separate the relative co
ntributions of catchment routing response and rainfall intensity to th
e scaling behavior of E[Q]. Our results also lead us to hypothesize th
at the heterogeneity of CV[Q] between catchments is primarily due to t
he heterogeneity of catchment response time, while the heterogeneity o
f E[Q] is primarily due to the heterogeneity of runoff generation proc
esses.