AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE PHYSICAL CAUSES OF SCALING AND HETEROGENEITY OF REGIONAL FLOOD FREQUENCY

Citation
Js. Robinson et M. Sivapalan, AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE PHYSICAL CAUSES OF SCALING AND HETEROGENEITY OF REGIONAL FLOOD FREQUENCY, Water resources research, 33(5), 1997, pp. 1045-1059
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Limnology,"Environmental Sciences","Water Resources
Journal title
ISSN journal
00431397
Volume
33
Issue
5
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1045 - 1059
Database
ISI
SICI code
0043-1397(1997)33:5<1045:AIITPC>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Peak discharge data from catchments in the central Appalachian region of eastern United States suggest that the coefficient of variation of annual flood peaks, CV[Q], is not constant, as implied by the index fl ood method but Varies with catchment size in a complex manner [Smith, 1992]. Gupta et al. [1994] have interpreted the data as indicating tha t for catchments smaller than a critical threshold size, CV[Q] increas es with increasing catchment size, while for larger catchments CV[Q] d ecreases with catchment size. Our analysis of the same discharge data suggests further that the spatial heterogeneity of these flood frequen cy characteristics, for example, mean annual flood, E[Q], and coeffici ent of variation, CV[Q], between catchments in the region is also not constant but varies systematically with catchment size. The spatial he terogeneity of E[Q] appears to decrease with catchment size, while het erogeneity of CV[Q] appears to mirror the observed scaling behavior of CV[Q]. These observations have been made based on statistical analysi s of empirical flood data without being underpinned by a physical theo ry to explain them. In this paper, motivated by these observations and by the need for a physical theory of regional flood frequency, we dev elop a simple derived flood frequency model. On the basis of insights provided by the model, we relate the increase of CV[Q] with catchment size for small catchments (smaller than a threshold size) to the scali ng behavior of the ratio of storm duration to catchment response time. On the other hand, we connect the decrease of CV[Q] with catchment si ze for larger catchments to the spatial scaling of rainfall (excess) i ntensity. Our simple model also permits us to separate the relative co ntributions of catchment routing response and rainfall intensity to th e scaling behavior of E[Q]. Our results also lead us to hypothesize th at the heterogeneity of CV[Q] between catchments is primarily due to t he heterogeneity of catchment response time, while the heterogeneity o f E[Q] is primarily due to the heterogeneity of runoff generation proc esses.