Life histories are generally assumed to evolve via antagonistic pleiotropy
(negative genetic correlations) among traits, and trade-offs between life-h
istory traits are typically studied using either phenotypic manipulations o
r selection experiments. We investigated the trade-off between egg size and
fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster by examining both the phenotypic and
genetic relationships between these traits after artificial selection for l
arge and small eggs, relative to female body size. Egg size responded stron
gly to selection in both directions, increasing in the large-egg selected l
ines and decreasing in the small-egg selected lines. Phenotypic correlation
s between egg size and fecundity in the large-egg selected lines were negat
ive, but no relationship between these traits occurred in either the contro
l or small-egg selected lines. There was no negative genetic correlation be
tween egg size and fecundity. Total reproductive allocation decreased in th
e small-egg selected lines but did not increase in the large-egg lines. Our
results have three implications. First, our selection procedure may have f
orced females selected for large eggs into a physiological trade-off not re
flected in a negative genetic correlation between these traits. Second, the
lack of a negative genetic correlation between egg size and number suggest
s that the phenotypic trade-off frequently observed between egg size and nu
mber in other organisms may not evolve over the short term via a direct gen
etic trade-off whereby increases in egg size are automatically accompanied
by decreased fecundity. Finally, total reproductive allocation may not evol
ve independently of egg size as commonly assumed.