B. Fredman et al., The effect of midazolam premedication on mental and psychomotor recovery in geriatric patients undergoing brief surgical procedures, ANESTH ANAL, 89(5), 1999, pp. 1161-1166
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
To assess the effect of TV midazolam premedication on recovery of cognitive
function, 90 geriatric patients (aged 65-81 yr) undergoing brief transuret
hral procedures were enrolled into this prospective, placebo-controlled, do
uble-blinded study. In all cases, a standard general anesthetic was adminis
tered. Thirty minutes before operating room transfer, patients in Group 0.5
mg, Group 2 mg, and Group S received 0.5 mg of midazolam, 2 mg of midazola
m, or an equal volume of saline, respectively. Before study-drug administra
tion (baseline), at 15 min thereafter, as well as on arrival in the postane
sthesia care unit (PACU), and at 60 min and 120 min, postoperatively, we ad
ministered a digit-symbol substitution test, a mini-mental test, a shape-so
rter test, and a patient-generated 100-mm visual analog score (0 = minimal
and 100 = maximal) for anxiety, sleepiness, and coordination A 4-point scal
e was used to assess the degree of patient sedation at 7, 15, and 30 min af
ter study-drug administration. Using a modified Aldrete scoring system, PAC
U discharge was determined by the PACU staff. Patient anxiety, sleepiness,
and coordination scores at baseline and at 15 min after study-drug administ
ration were similar. When compared with saline, midazolam was associated wi
th a significantly (P < 0.05) higher incidence of "deep" sedation. In Group
2 mg, the incidence of a low preoperative Spo(2) (<94%) was significantly
(P < 0.05) higher when compared with Group S. Emergence, extubation, and or
ientation times, as well as time to follow commands were unaffected by mida
zolam premedication. Postoperatively, the digit-symbol substitution test, m
ini-mental test, and shape-sorter test were similar among the groups. Howev
er, time to PACU discharge was significantly (P = 0.03) longer in the two m
idazolam treatment groups (41 +/- 25 min,60 +/- 32 min, 53 +/- 39 min for G
roups S, 0.5 mg, and 2 mg, respectively). Finally, patient satisfaction was
unaffected by the randomization schedule. Implications: TV premedicant mid
azolam 0.5 mg or 2 mg does not adversely affect mental and psychomotor reco
very in geriatric patients undergoing brief surgical procedures. However, m
idazolam administration significantly prolonged postanesthesia care unit di
scharge time. Finally, during the preoperative period, midazolam increases
the incidence of a Spo(2) <94% in a dose-dependent manner.