Objectives: To investigate why sexual abuse was suspected and what physical
findings were present among children referred for the evaluation of sexual
abuse without a verbal disclosure or witnessed abuse, and to determine if
the reasons for requesting medical evaluation varied by referral source.
Design: Prospective descriptive study.
Setting/Patients: Two groups of consecutive children referred to a sexual a
buse evaluation clinic.
Main Outcome Measure: Categorization of physical examination findings for l
ikelihood of sexual abuse (definite, suggestive, nonspecific, normal, non-a
buse-related finding).
Results: Of 393 children studied, 190 (48.3%) had a definite or probable hi
story of sexual abuse, 130 (33.1%) had a suspicious history, and 73 (18.6%)
had "no history." The no-history group was referred most often for physica
l findings (42 patients [57%]). Compared with other referral sources, physi
cians more frequently referred patients for physical findings, parental anx
iety, and behavior changes. Regardless of history, examination findings wer
e normal or nonspecific in 83.5% to 94.4% of cases. Suggestive or definite
examination findings were more frequent for children with definite or proba
ble histories, while non-abuse-related findings were more common for the no
-history group. Only 2 children (3%) with no reported history of abuse had
suggestive physical findings, and none had definite findings.
Conclusions: Physicians are more likely than public agencies to refer child
ren for sexual abuse evaluation for reasons other than disclosure by the ch
ild. For most of these children, examination is unlikely to influence the s
uspicion of abuse. Improved physician training and selected referrals are i
ndicated.