Medical evaluation of sexual abuse in children without disclosed or witnessed abuse

Citation
K. Bowen et Mb. Aldous, Medical evaluation of sexual abuse in children without disclosed or witnessed abuse, ARCH PED AD, 153(11), 1999, pp. 1160-1164
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics,"Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE
ISSN journal
10724710 → ACNP
Volume
153
Issue
11
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1160 - 1164
Database
ISI
SICI code
1072-4710(199911)153:11<1160:MEOSAI>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate why sexual abuse was suspected and what physical findings were present among children referred for the evaluation of sexual abuse without a verbal disclosure or witnessed abuse, and to determine if the reasons for requesting medical evaluation varied by referral source. Design: Prospective descriptive study. Setting/Patients: Two groups of consecutive children referred to a sexual a buse evaluation clinic. Main Outcome Measure: Categorization of physical examination findings for l ikelihood of sexual abuse (definite, suggestive, nonspecific, normal, non-a buse-related finding). Results: Of 393 children studied, 190 (48.3%) had a definite or probable hi story of sexual abuse, 130 (33.1%) had a suspicious history, and 73 (18.6%) had "no history." The no-history group was referred most often for physica l findings (42 patients [57%]). Compared with other referral sources, physi cians more frequently referred patients for physical findings, parental anx iety, and behavior changes. Regardless of history, examination findings wer e normal or nonspecific in 83.5% to 94.4% of cases. Suggestive or definite examination findings were more frequent for children with definite or proba ble histories, while non-abuse-related findings were more common for the no -history group. Only 2 children (3%) with no reported history of abuse had suggestive physical findings, and none had definite findings. Conclusions: Physicians are more likely than public agencies to refer child ren for sexual abuse evaluation for reasons other than disclosure by the ch ild. For most of these children, examination is unlikely to influence the s uspicion of abuse. Improved physician training and selected referrals are i ndicated.