Jvmg. Bovee et al., Chondrosarcoma of the phalanx: A locally aggressive lesion with minimal metastatic potential - A report of 35 gases and a review of the literature, CANCER, 86(9), 1999, pp. 1724-1732
BACKGROUND. Enchondroma is the most common primary benign bone tumor of the
hand, especially the phalanges, whereas chondrosarcoma is uncommon at this
site. Although phalangeal chondrosarcoma may have ominous histologic featu
res, its biologic behavior is relatively indolent.
METHODS. Thirty-five cases of phalangeal lesions previously diagnosed as ch
ondrosarcoma were studied. Histologic and tumor-biologic parameters (Ki-67
and p53 immunohistochemistry) were investigated and correlated with clinica
l behavior.
RESULTS. All cases were characterized by unequivocal malignant histologic f
eatures (Grade 2 or higher) or Grade 1 malignant histologic features combin
ed with the presence of cortical destruction and soft tissue extension. The
median age of the patients at the time of diagnosis was 67 years (range 21
-87 years), with a slight female predominance. Occurrence in the hand was m
ore common than in the foot, with the proximal phalanx affected most often.
Treatment varied from local therapy (curettage or local excision) in 16 pa
tients to amputation or exarticulation in 19 cases. Follow-up ranged from 8
-432 months for 28 patients. Ten of 15 tumors treated by local therapy recu
rred whereas none of 13 tumors treated by radical surgery recurred. The med
ian survival was 20.8 years; none of 28 patients developed metastases nor d
ied of disease. Both the type of treatment and localization in the proximal
phalanx were associated independently with local recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS. Phalangeal chondrosarcoma behaves as a locally aggressive lesi
on and, in contrast to chondrosarcomas located elsewhere, rarely metastasiz
es. Treatment is indicated only because of its locally destructive growth.
The authors believe that given the excellent survival data, curettage with
adequate follow-up should be considered as the treatment of choice if techn
ically feasible, especially in those cases in which amputation would lead t
o a significant loss of hand function. [See editorial on pages 1635-7, this
issue.] (C) 1999 American Cancer Society.