Nr. Cook et al., beta-carotene supplementation for patients with low baseline levels and decreased risks of total and prostate carcinoma, CANCER, 86(9), 1999, pp. 1783-1792
BAGKGROUND, The Physicians' Health Study was a randomized, double-blind, pl
acebo-controlled trial using a 2 x 2 factorial design including supplementa
tion with beta-carotene (50 mg every other day) in the primary prevention o
f cancer among 22,071 U.S. male physicians ages 40-84 years at randomizatio
n. Before randomization, the authors collected baseline blood specimens to
determine whether any benefit was greater among or confined to those with l
ow baseline levels of beta-carotene.
METHODS, Baseline blood samples were collected from 14,916 participants. Th
ese samples were assayed, according to a nested case-control design, from 1
439 men subsequently diagnosed with cancer over 12 years of follow-up (631
with prostate carcinoma) and 2204 controls matched by age and smoking habit
s.
RESULTS, Men in the lowest quartile for plasma beta-carotene at baseline ha
d a marginally significant (P = 0.07) increased risk of cancer compared wit
h those in the highest quartile (relative risk [RR] = 1.30, 95% confidence
interval [CI], 0.98-1.74). Men in the lowest quartile assigned at random to
beta-carotene supplementation had a possible but nonsignificant decrease i
n overall cancer risk (RR = 0.83, 95% CI, 0.63-1.09] compared with those as
signed to placebo. This was primarily due to a significant reduction in the
risk of prostate carcinoma (RR = 0.68, 95% CI, 0.46-0.99) in this group. A
fter the first 2 years of follow-up were excluded, the results were virtual
ly unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS. These prespecified subgroup analyses appeared to support the i
dea that beta-carotene supplementation may reduce risk of prostate carcinom
a among those with low baseline levels. Further follow-up of this populatio
n will help determine whether these findings are valid. [See editorial on p
ages 1629-31, this issue.] (C) 1999 American Cancer Society.