Frequency of abnormal pancreatic and biliary sphincter manometry compared with clinical suspicion of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

Citation
D. Eversman et al., Frequency of abnormal pancreatic and biliary sphincter manometry compared with clinical suspicion of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, GASTROIN EN, 50(5), 1999, pp. 637-641
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology
Journal title
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
ISSN journal
00165107 → ACNP
Volume
50
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
637 - 641
Database
ISI
SICI code
0016-5107(199911)50:5<637:FOAPAB>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Background: Sphincter of Oddi manometry as performed at ERCP is the most ac cepted method to evaluate for sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. To fully asses s: for sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, both the pancreatic and the bile duct s must be evaluated. We assessed the frequency of pancreatic and biliary sp hincter abnormalities in a large series of patients. Methods: A total of 593 patients underwent manometry of the biliary and pan creatic ducts at one endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography session . Basal sphincter pressure greater than or equal to 40 mm Hg was considered abnormal. Phasic waves were not evaluated. Manometric abnormalities were c orrelated with the clinical presentation as categorized using a modified Ge enen/Hogan classification. Results: Of 360 patients with intact sphincters, 18.9% had abnormal pancrea tic sphincter basal pressure alone, 11.4% had abnormal biliary basal sphinc ter pressure alone, and in 31.4% the basal pressure was abnormal for both s phincters; thus, 60.1% of the patients had sphincter dysfunction. The,frequ ency of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction did-not differ whether typed by bilia ry or pancreatic criteria: approximately 65% type II and 59% type III. Of p atients without pancreatitis, 55.9% had an abnormal basal sphincter pressur e, whereas sphincter dysfunction was present in 72.3% of those with idiopat hic pancreatitis and 53.9% of patients with chronic pancreatitis. Of patien ts with an ablated biliary sphincter, 45.9% had abnormal basal pancreatic s phincter pressure and only;0.6% had an abnormal biliary sphincter pressure alone. Abnormal pressure in both sphincters was found in 9.3%. Conclusion: If both portions of the sphincter of Oddi are studied simultane ously, abnormalities are found very commonly (55% to 72%). Assessment Of bo th Sides of the sphincter is necessary. Classifying patients according to b oth pancreatic and biliary sphincter segments is cumbersome, and may be rep laced by an overall type. Using this-modified classification, the frequency of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is similar in both type:ll and type III p atients (59% to 67%).