The aim of this study was to examine the effects of diagnosis of hepatitis
C virus (HCV) infection on quality of life in a cohort admitted to Fairfiel
d Infectious Diseases Hospital with acute hepatitis from 1971 to 1975. Sera
stored from the original admission were tested for antibody to HCV, System
atic approaches were used to locate anti-HCV-positive individuals and outco
mes assessed by the Short Form 36 (SF-36) scale and a study-specific questi
onnaire as well as clinical review. Study subjects' SF-36 scores were compa
red with Australian population norms. Anti-HCV and HCV-RNA positive individ
uals (n = 15) aware of their serostatus rated significantly worse on 7 of 8
SF-36 scales compared with population norms. However, HCV-seropositive and
RNA-positive individuals unaware of their HCV serostatus (n = 19) scored s
ignificantly worse in only 3 scales. Those aware of their serostatus did no
t differ sociodemographically, clinically, virologically, or serologically
from those who were unaware, nor was there a ink between quality of life (Q
OL) scores and objective, measures of ill health. All subjects had injected
drugs in the past. In conclusion, HCV-RNA and anti-HCV-positive individual
s in our study have significantly poorer subjective health status 26 years
after original infection compared with population norms. QOL measures were
significantly worse for HCV-seropositive individuals aware of their serosta
tus compared with those unaware. We feel that the reduced QOL in the diagno
sed group may be partially am effect of labeling and that the impact of the
diagnostic process per se on QOL in individuals with HCV requires further
evaluation.