N. Meda et al., HIV infection among pregnant women in Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso: comparison of voluntary and blinded seroprevalence estimates, INT J STD A, 10(11), 1999, pp. 738-740
The objective of our study was to estimate the prevalence of HIV infection
among pregnant women in Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso) according to 2 survey
methods. Unlinked anonymous HIV screening was performed among women attend
ing 2 antenatal clinics. Voluntary and confidential HIV counselling and tes
ting were offered to women attending 2 other antenatal clinics in the same
time period, September-October 1996. Voluntary HIV testing was performed in
the context of a clinical trial on mother-to-child transmission of HIV (AN
RS 049 clinical trial) with an acceptance rate of HIV testing of 93%. The f
irst survey recruited 200 women and the second, 424. The mean age (24.6 yea
rs vs 24.8 years) and the mean number of pregnancies (3.1 vs 3.3) of women
were comparable, in the 2 studies (P=0.69 and P=0.26, respectively). Preval
ence of HIV infection in the blinded survey was estimated at 10.0% (95% con
fidence interval (CI): 6.4-15.2), while it was 9.4% (95% CI: 6.9-12.7) in t
he voluntary HIV screening programme. These 2 estimates were not statistica
lly different (P=0.82). In the voluntary screening study, the prevalence of
HIV infection was significantly different between age groups 15-24 years a
nd 25-49 years (13.9% vs 4.5%, P<0.001). Ln the age group 25-49 years, the
prevalence of HIV infection estimated in the blinded study and in the volun
tary screening study were significantly different (10.5% vs 4.5%, P=0.04) s
uggesting a potential participation bias among pregnant women of older age
in the voluntary, confidential HIV screening group. In conclusion, for the
purpose of HIV surveillance, the most reliable method for HIV prevalence re
mains the unlinked, anonymous testing.