Two subfamilies of olfactory receptor genes in medaka fish, Oryzias latipes: Genomic organization and differential expression in olfactory epithelium
Citation
A. Yasuoka et al., Two subfamilies of olfactory receptor genes in medaka fish, Oryzias latipes: Genomic organization and differential expression in olfactory epithelium, J BIOCHEM, 126(5), 1999, pp. 866-873
Categorie Soggetti
Biochemistry & Biophysics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY
SICI code
0021-924X(199911)126:5<866:TSOORG>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
We cloned and characterized two subfamilies of olfatory receptor (OR) genes
from medaka fish (Oryzias latipes). Southern blot analysis showed that eac
h of the two subfamilies, designated as subfamilies Y and E, consists of ab
out five members, as usually observed for other vertebrate ORs. Analyses of
the genomic clones encoding these members revealed that two members of sub
family Y and four members of subfamily E are tandemly reiterated in 15 and
22 kbp regions of the medaka genome, respectively. The members of each subf
amily show very similar amino acid sequences, with similarities greater tha
n 70%. Hoc-ever, the similarities to the sequences of other vertebrate ORs
are lower. Members of subfamily Y show amino acid sequence similarities of
ca. 30% to other fish ORs, including subfamily E members, as well as to mam
malian ORs. On the other hand, members of subfamily E show sequence similar
ities of ca. 50% to other fish ORs and ca. 30% to mammalian ORs. Phylogenic
analyses of various fish ORs, including medaka, catfish, and zebrafish ORs
, indicate that the primary structures of fish ORs are diverse compared wit
h those of mammalian ORs, which consist of much larger numbers of members.
The expression patterns of subfamilies Y and E genes in the olfactory epith
elium of adult medaka fish were examined by in situ hybridization, showing
that the frequency of positive signals is different between the two subfami
lies: about 2% of the olfactory neurons are positive to probes for members
of subfamily Y, while less than 1% are positive to probes for members of su
bfamily E. These results indicate that each subfamily is under different tr
anscriptional control.