Phase II trial of N,N-diethyl-2-[4-(phenylmethyl)phenoxy]ethanamine. HCl and doxorubicin chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: A National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study
K. Khoo et al., Phase II trial of N,N-diethyl-2-[4-(phenylmethyl)phenoxy]ethanamine. HCl and doxorubicin chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: A National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study, J CL ONCOL, 17(11), 1999, pp. 3431-3437
Purpose: This multicenter phase II trial investigated the efficacy and toxi
city of a combination of the novel intracellular histamine antagonist, N,N-
diethyl-2-[4-(phenylmethyl)phenoxy]ethanamine.HCl (DPPE), and doxorubicin i
n patients with anthracycline-naive metastatic breast cancer. Preclinical m
odels and early single institutional studies suggested DPPE could potentiat
e the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin.
Patients and Methods: Forty-two women, 32 to 77 years old (median, 59 years
), with anthracycline-naive metastatic breast cancer were treated. Patients
may have had one previous regimen of nonanthracycline chemotherapy, either
in the adjuvant or metastatic disease treatment setting. DPPE (6 mg/kg) wa
s administered as an 80 minute intravenous infusion with doxorubicin (60 mg
/m(2)) given intravenously over the last 20 minutes of the DPPE infusion. P
atients were premedicated with an antiemetic and sedating regimen. The DPPE
/doxorubicin treatment was given every 21 days for a maximum of seven cycle
s.
Results: All 42 patients were assessable. Overall, toxicity was comparable
to that expected with doxorubicin alone, with the exception of DPPE-related
motion sickness, mild hallucinations, and cerebellar signs at the time of
the infusion. These CNS side effects were manageable in an ambulatory care
setting, improved with subsequent cycles of treatment, and did not usually
require hospitalization. Four patients developed febrile neutropenia. Thirt
y-five patients received four or more cycles of chemotherapy. The overall r
esponse rate was 52.5% (95% confidence interval, 36% to 68%), with 9.5% com
plete responses (n = 4), 43% partial responses (n = 18), and 38% of patient
s with stable disease (n = 16).
Conclusion: The antitumour effects of DPPE/doxorubicin the 52.5% response r
ate seems encouraging, particularly in consideration of the fact that a rec
ently reported randomized National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Tria
ls Group trial using single-agent doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) in one of the trea
tment arms achieved a 31% response rate. Thus, a randomized phase III trial
of doxorubicin versus doxorubicin plus DPPE is being conducted in this cli
nical setting. (C) 1999 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.