Clinical trial to assess the relative efficacy of fluorouracil and leucovorin, fluorouracil and levamisole, and fluorouracil, leucovorin, and levamisole in patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon: Results from national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project C-04

Citation
N. Wolmark et al., Clinical trial to assess the relative efficacy of fluorouracil and leucovorin, fluorouracil and levamisole, and fluorouracil, leucovorin, and levamisole in patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon: Results from national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project C-04, J CL ONCOL, 17(11), 1999, pp. 3553-3559
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
ISSN journal
0732183X → ACNP
Volume
17
Issue
11
Year of publication
1999
Pages
3553 - 3559
Database
ISI
SICI code
0732-183X(199911)17:11<3553:CTTATR>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the efficacy of leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil (FU+L V) with that of fluorouracil and levamisole (FU+LEV) or with the combinatio n of FU + LV and levamisole (FU + LV + LEV). Patients and Methods: Between July 1989 and December 1990, 2,151 patients w ith Dukes' B (stage II) and Dukes' C (stage III) carcinoma of the colon wer e entered onto National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowl project protocol C-04, patients were randomly assigned to receive FU+LV (weekly regimen), FU + LEV, or the combination of FU+LV+LEV, The average time on study was 86 m onths. Results: A pairwise comparison between patients treated with FU+LV or FU+LE V disclosed a prolongation in disease-free survival (DFS) in favor of the F U+LV group (65% v 60%; P = .04); there was a small prolongation in overall survival that was of borderline significance (74% v 70%; P = .07), There wa s no difference in the pairwise comparison between patients who received FU + LV or FU+LV+LEV for either DFS (65% v 64%; P = .67) or overall survival (74% v 73%; P = .99), There was no interaction between Dukes' stage and the effect of treatment, Conclusion: In patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon, treatme nt with FU+LV seems to confer a small DFS advantage and a borderline prolon gation in overall survival when compared with treatment with FU+LEV, The ad dition of LEV to FU+LV does not provide any additional benefit over and abo ve that achieved with FU+LV, These findings support the use of adjuvant FULV as an acceptable therapeutic standard in patients with Dukes' B and C ca rcinoma of the colon. (C) 1999 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.