Ka. Phillips et al., Breast carcinomas arising in carriers of mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2: Are they prognostically different?, J CL ONCOL, 17(11), 1999, pp. 3653-3663
Purpose: To review the preclinical and clinical stud ies relevant to the pr
ognosis and prognostic associations of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast c
arcinomas, with an emphasis on research methodology.
Methods: Reports of relevant studies obtained from a MEDLINE search, and re
ferences from these articles, were critically reviewed.
Results: Consistent associations with both favorable (medullary or atypical
medullary carcinoma) and unfavorable thigh tumor grade, hormone receptor n
egativity, somatic p53 mutation) prognostic characteristics have been found
for BRCA1-associated breast carcinomas, Inconsistent results have been dem
onstrated for prognostic associations of BRCA2-associated breast tumors, Cl
inical studies that have directly assessed the prognosis of these rumors ha
ve not shown a clear effect of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, but no study has us
ed optimal methodology. In vitro and animal model data suggest a possible i
nfluence of these mutations on response to agents that cause double-strand
DNA breaks, but clinical data are limited.
Conclusion: The elucidation of an identifiable subgroup of breast carcinoma
s that result from germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 may be an important
step toward genotype-based understanding of prognosis and choice of therap
y in this disease. However, currently there are inadequate data to support
use of BRCA1 or BRCA2 status to counsel individuals regarding their prognos
is or to select treatment. Well-designed studies of population-based incept
ion cohorts of breast cancer patients, which have adequate sample size and
complete follow-up, and which use objective outcome criteria and blinding o
f outcome assessment, are required to optimally address this question. (C)
1999 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.