Human herpesviruses 6 and 7 as potential pathogens after liver transplant:Prospective comparison with the effect of cytomegalovirus

Citation
Pd. Griffiths et al., Human herpesviruses 6 and 7 as potential pathogens after liver transplant:Prospective comparison with the effect of cytomegalovirus, J MED VIROL, 59(4), 1999, pp. 496-501
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease",Microbiology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
ISSN journal
01466615 → ACNP
Volume
59
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
496 - 501
Database
ISI
SICI code
0146-6615(199912)59:4<496:HH6A7A>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Because cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an important opportunistic infection after liver transplant, we conducted a prospective study to see if the same appl ied to human herpesviruses (HHV)-6 and -7. We used polymerase chain reactio n (PCR) methods optimised to detect active, not latent, infection and studi ed patients not receiving antiviral prophylaxis for CMV. Post-transplant, 5 36 blood samples were tested by PCR (median 7; range 4-50). Active infectio n with CMV was detected in 28/60 (47%), HHV-6 in 19/60 (32%), and HHV-7 in 29/60 (48%) of patients. The PCR-positive samples were tested by quantitati ve-competitive PCR to measure the virus load of each betaher-pesvirus. The median peak virus load for CMV was significantly greater than that for HHV- 6 or HHV-7. Detailed clinicopathological analyses for the whole population showed that CMV and HHV-6 were each significantly associated with biopsy-pr oven graft rejection. Individual case histories suggested that HHV-6 and HH V-7 may be the cause of some episodes of hepatitis and pyrexia. It is concl uded that HHV-6 is a previously unrecognized contributor to the morbidity o f liver transplantation, that HHV-7 may also be important and that both vir uses should be included in the differential diagnosis of graft dysfunction. (C) 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.