OBJECTIVES This study was performed to compare the long-term clinical effic
iency of treatment with metoprolol versus carvedilol in patients with chron
ic heart failure.
BACKGROUND Beta-adrenergic blockade is of proven value in chronic heart fai
lure. Metoprolol, a selective beta-blocker, is widely used, but recent tria
ls suggest carvedilol, a nonselective beta-blocker with alpha-1-receptor an
tagonist activity and antioxidant activities, is also effective. It is unce
rtain, however, if these additional properties of carvedilol protide furthe
r clinical benefit compared with metoprolol.
METHODS In this randomized double-blind control trial, 51 patients with chr
onic heart failure and mean left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction of 26%
+/- 1.84% were randomly assigned treatment with metoprolol 50 mg twice dail
y or carvedilol 25 mg twice daily in addition to standard therapy after a f
our-week dose titration period for a total of 12 weeks. Response was assess
ed by a quality of life questionnaire, New York Heart Association class, ex
ercise capacity (6-min walk rest), radionucleotide ventriculography for LV
ejection fraction, two-dimensional echocardiography measurement of LV dimen
sions and diastolic filling and 24-h electrocardiograph monitoring to asses
s heart rate variability.
RESULTS Both carvedilol and metoprolol produced highly significant improvem
ent in symptoms (p < 0.001), exercise capacity (p < 0.05) and LV ejection f
raction (p < 0.001), and there were no significant differences between the
two drugs. Carvedilol had a significantly greater effect on sitting and sta
nding brood pressure, LV end-diastolic dimension and normalized the mitral
E wave deceleration time.
CONCLUSIONS Both metoprolol and carvedilol were equally effective in improv
ing symptoms, quality of life, exercise capacity and LV ejection fraction,
although carvedilol lowers brood pressure more than metoprolol. (C) 1999 by
the American College of Cardiology.