Management factors affecting the risk for vesicular stomatitis in livestock operations in the western United States

Citation
Hs. Hurd et al., Management factors affecting the risk for vesicular stomatitis in livestock operations in the western United States, J AM VET ME, 215(9), 1999, pp. 1263-1268
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
ISSN journal
00031488 → ACNP
Volume
215
Issue
9
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1263 - 1268
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-1488(19991101)215:9<1263:MFATRF>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Objective-To identify management factors affecting the risk of animals deve loping vesicular stomatitis (VS). Design-Case-control study. Animals-Horses, cattle, and sheep with suspected vesicular stomatitis on 39 5 premises in Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Arizona. Procedure-Data were collected during the VS outbreak of 1997. Diagnostician s interviewed livestock owners and completed a supplemental questionnaire. Cases were defined as those premises that had a completed questionnaire and had greater than or equal to 1 animal positive for VS. Control premises we re all premises investigated that had a completed questionnaire and on whic h the animals had been tested but VS was not detected. Results-Animals that had access to a shelter or barn had a reduced risk of developing VS (OR, 0.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.99). This e ffect was more pronounced for equine premises (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.9) . Conversely, during an adjusted analysis on equine premises, risk of devel oping disease was increased slightly where animals had access to pasture (O R, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.7). On all premises where owners reported insect populations were greater than normal, odds of developing disease were signi ficantly increased (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.47 to 4.47). Premises with animals h oused < 0.25 miles from running water were more than twice as likely to hav e clinical signs of VS (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.32 to 5.0). Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-These results support reports of others that suggest biting insects are a vector in VS virus transmission. Manageme nt practices to reduce exposure to biting insects might reduce the risk of VS.