In Germany, the wasted vote thesis is quite popular both in political scien
ce and among politicians. This widely held view is underpined by empirical
evidence which suggests that it makes a difference how a voter perceives th
e electoral prospects of his preferred parry. In this contribution, however
, we discuss whether the usual approach to test the wasted vote thesis is a
dequate. In particular, we argue that seemingly convincing empirical eviden
ce in favour of the thesis might be interpreted in terms of psychological r
ationalization. Multivariate analyses reveal that this theoretically reason
able suspicion is empirically justified because the effect of the perceived
electoral prospects vanishes if it is controlled for party identification.
These results lead us to the conclusion that political parties need nor pa
y as much attention to campaign efforts referring to their electoral prospe
cts as they usually do. Additionally, our findings suggest chat it may be p
romising to apply the argument presented in this contribution to other elec
toral settings.