Background The potential economic effects of the allocation of cadaveric ki
dneys on the basis of tissue-matching criteria are controversial. We analyz
ed the economic costs associated with the transplantation of cadaveric kidn
eys with various numbers of HLA mismatches and examined the potential econo
mic benefits of a local, as compared with a national, system designed to mi
nimize HLA mismatches between donor and recipient in first cadaveric renal
transplantations.
Methods All data were supplied by the U.S. Renal Data System. Data on all p
ayments made by Medicare from 1991 through 1997 for the care of recipients
of a first cadaveric renal transplant were analyzed according to the number
of HLA-A, B, and DR mismatches between donor and recipient and the duratio
n of cold ischemia before transplantation.
Results Average Medicare payments for renal-transplant recipients in the th
ree years after transplantation increased from $60,436 per patient for full
y HLA-matched kidneys (those with no HLA-A, B, or DR mismatches) to $80,807
for kidneys with six HLA mismatches between donor and recipient, a differe
nce of 34 percent (P<0.001). By three years after transplantation, the aver
age Medicare payments were $64,119 for transplantations of kidneys with les
s than 12 hours of cold-ischemia time and $74,997 for those with more than
36 hours (P<0.001). In simulations, the assignment of cadaveric kidneys to
recipients by a method that minimized HLA mismatching within a local geogra
phic area (i.e., within one of the approximately 50 organ-procurement organ
izations, which cover widely varying geographic areas) produced the largest
cost savings ($4,290 per patient over a period of three years) and the lar
gest improvements in the graft-survival rate (2.3 percent) when the potenti
al costs of longer cold-ischemia time were considered.
Conclusions Transplantation of better-matched cadaveric kidneys could have
substantial economic advantages. In our simulations, HLA-based allocation o
f kidneys at the local level produced the largest estimated cost savings, w
hen the duration of cold ischemia was taken into account. No additional sav
ings were estimated to result from a national allocation program, because t
he additional costs of longer cold-ischemia time were greater than the adva
ntages of optimizing HLA matching. (N Engl J Med 1999;341:1440-6.) (C)1999,
Massachusetts Medical Society.