Evaluation of polyurethane stent implantation for the treatment of complete obstruction of the nasolacrimal system: 8-month follow-up and complications
N. Anders et al., Evaluation of polyurethane stent implantation for the treatment of complete obstruction of the nasolacrimal system: 8-month follow-up and complications, OPHTHALMOLO, 96(10), 1999, pp. 658-662
Dacryocystorhinostomy is still the standard procedure complete stenosis of
the nasolacrimal duct. New methods try to preserve the natural lacrimal pat
hway. Song implanted in 1995 a nasolacrimal polyurethane stent through the
nasolacrimal duct. The results and complications of this new method are des
cribed in this prospective study.
Methods: Thirty consecutive patients with complete obstruction of the nasol
acrimal duct or lacrimal sac were included in the study. The stenosis was l
ocalized by dacryocystography. The ages ranged from 22 to 87 years (mean, 5
8.9 +/- 16 years). Dacryocystography was performed immediately, 4 weeks and
8 months after the procedure to verify the position and patency of the ste
nt.
Results: Twenty-five short (35 mm) and 5 long (45 mm) stents were implanted
. Twenty-four of 30 patients after 4 weeks and 9 of 10 patients after 8 mon
ths had reduced or no complaints. In 1 patient the stent was obstructed. Fo
rceful irrigation with saline solution permitted recanalization. In 1 patie
nt the stent had moved into the upper canaliculus. Because of irritation of
the canaliculus it had to be pulled out after 2 months.
Conclusion: The follow-up is still too short to recommend stent implantatio
n as a real alternative to dacryocystorhinostomy. The main advantages are t
hat the procedure is faster, no incision is necessary, and the local anesth
esia is easier. The disadvantage is the need for X-ray examination.