Background. To prevent breastfeeding problems, cup-feeding has been recomme
nded as a method of providing medically necessary supplemental feedings to
breastfed infants.
Objectives. To compare amounts ingested, administration time, and infant ph
ysiologic stability during cup-, bottle-, and breastfeeding.
Design/Methods. A total of 98 term, healthy newborns were randomized to eit
her cup- feeding (n = 51) or bottle- feeding (n = 47). The heart (HR), resp
iratory (RR), and oxygen (O-2) saturation rates were monitored on these inf
ants and 25 breastfed newborns during 1 feeding. Differences in amounts ing
ested and administration times were evaluated with t tests and physiologic
data with repeat measures analysis of variance.
Results. There were no significant differences in administration time, amou
nts ingested or overall HR, RR, and (O-2) saturation rates, between cup and
bottle groups. Breastfed infants had longer administration times and lower
overall HR, RR, and higher O2 saturation as compared with cup- and bottle-
fed infants.
Conclusions. Administration times, amounts ingested, and infant physiologic
stability do not differ with cup- and bottle- feeding. Breastfeeding takes
longer than cup- or bottle- feeding, but infants experience less physiolog
ic variability. These data support cup- feeding as an alternative to bottle
- feeding for supplying supplements to breastfed infants.