Objective:To investigate peritoneal defense during icodextrin use in contin
uous cyclic peritoneal dialysis (CCPD).
Design: In an open, prospective, P-year follow-up study, CCPD patients were
randomized to either glucose (Glu) or icodextrin (Ico) for their long dayt
ime dwell.
Setting: University hospital and teaching hospital.
Patients: Both established and patients new to CCPD were included. A life e
xpectancy of more than 2 years, a stable clinical condition, and written in
formed consent were necessary before entry. Patients aged under 18 years, t
hose who had peritonitis in the previous month, and women of childbearing p
otential, unless taking adequate contraceptive precautions, were excluded.
Thirty-eight patients (19 Glu, 19 Ice) started the study. The median follow
-up was 16 and 17 months for Glu and Ico respectively (range 0.5 - 25 month
s and 5 - 25 months, respectively).
Outcome Measures: Peritoneal defense characteristics and peritoneal dialysi
s-related infections were recorded every 3 months.
Results:Total peritoneal white cell count tended to decrease over time in b
oth groups. After 1 year, absolute numbers and percentages of effluent peri
toneal macrophages (PM Phi s) were significantly higher in Ico than in Glu
patients; this difference in the percentage persisted after 2 years. Percen
tage of mesothelial cells increased overtime in Ico patients. The phagocyti
c capacity of PM Phi s decreased over time, resulting in a borderline signi
ficant difference for coagulase-negative staphylococci (p = 0.05) and a sig
nificant difference for Escherichia coli(p < 0.05) phagocytosis in favor of
Ico patients. PM Phi oxidative metabolism remained stable over time withou
t a difference between the groups. PM Phi, cytokine production and effluent
opsonic capacity also remained stable over time. Finally, 16 peritonitis e
pisodes in Glu and 14 in Ico patients occurred. Glucose patients had 37 and
Ico patients 32 exit-site infections during the study.
Conclusion: CCPD patients using Ico did equally as well as Glu-treated pati
ents with respect to clinical infections and most peritoneal defense charac
teristics. However, in a few peritoneal defense tests, Ice-treated patients
did better.