Laying hen productivity as affected by energy, supplemental fat, and linoleic acid concentration of the diet

Citation
S. Grobas et al., Laying hen productivity as affected by energy, supplemental fat, and linoleic acid concentration of the diet, POULTRY SCI, 78(11), 1999, pp. 1542-1551
Citations number
47
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
POULTRY SCIENCE
ISSN journal
00325791 → ACNP
Volume
78
Issue
11
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1542 - 1551
Database
ISI
SICI code
0032-5791(199911)78:11<1542:LHPAAB>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
A trial using 720 Isabrown hens was conducted to determine the influence of energy (AME(n)), supplemental fat (SFAT), and linolenic acid (LIN) concent ration of the diet on performance and weight of eggs and egg components thr oughout the laying cycle (22 to 65 wk of age). There were six treatments wh ose calculated AME(n) ,SFAT, and LIN content were, respectively: 1) 2,810 k cal/kg, 0%, 1.15%; 2) 2,810 kcal/kg, 4%, 1.15%; 3) 2,810 kcal/kg, 4%, 1.65% ; 4) 2,680 kcal/kg, 0%, 1.15%; 5) 2,680 kcal/kg, 4%, 1.15%; and 6) 2,,680 k cal/kg, 4%, and 1.65%. Ail diets were formulated. to have the same crude pr otein, lysine, TSAA, calcium, and nonphytin phosphorus levels per kilocalor ie of AME(n). The data were analyzed with SFAT constant (4%) and AME(n) and LIN variables (Diets 5 3, 5, and 6) and with LIN constant (1.15%) and AME( n) and SFAT variables (Diets 1, 2, 4, and 5). When LIN was maintained at a constant of 1.15%, an increase in the AME(n) of the diets from 2,680 to 2,8 10 kcal/kg decreased feed intake by 4% (P < 0.001). Increasing AME(n) also improved feed conversion per dozen eggs and per kilogram of eggs by 4.9 and 4.7% (P < 0.05), respectively, and increased BW gain by 55.7% (P < 0.05). Egg production rate, egg weight, egg mass output; and energy intake were no t modified by treatments. An increase in SFAT within both energy levels fro m 0 to 4% improved all of the traits studied except feed conversion. Supple mental fat increased both yolk and albumen weight, but the effect was more pronounced on the later. When SFAT was maintained constant at 4%, an increa se in AME(n) of the diets decreased feed intake and improved feed conversio n per dozen and per kilogram of eggs by 5.7, 5.5, and 5.2%, respectively (P < 0.001). An increase in LIN content from 1.15 to 1.65% did not modify any of the parameters studied. The results indicate that SFAT consistently imp roves productivity of hens and egg weight and that the LIN requirement for maximal productivity is 1.15% or less. The beneficial effects of adding SFA T to diets containing more than 1.15% LIN are due to the fat itself rather than to an increase in LIN or AME(n) of the diet.