Background and purpose: The description of giant pituitary adenoma is not c
lear yet. In this study we tried to identify which adenomas can be defined
as giant pituitary adenomas when tumor control and progression free surviva
l (PFS) are taken as end points and we also tried to evaluate prognostic fa
ctors other than tumor size.
Materials and methods: Between January 1981 and December 1997, 74 patients
with pituitary macroadenomas more than 2 cm in size were treated. Of these
30 had tumors of more than 4 cm, while 44 patients were with tumors of 2-4
cm. Two patients received primary radiotherapy, while 72 were treated posto
peratively. In the postoperative group, 52 patients underwent immediate rad
iotherapy after surgery and 20 were treated with irradiation after regrowth
or progression of the tumor after initial surgery. The mean and median tum
or doses were 5518 and 5425 cGy, respectively.
Results: Overall primary tumor control rate was 84%. The local control rate
s among patients with tumors more than 4 cm and among patients with tumors
2-4 cm after radiotherapy were 73 and 91%, respectively. PFS was 65% for pa
tients who had a tumor size of more than 4 cm and 87% for the patients with
tumor size of 2-4 cm (P = 0.09). Young age (<20) and tumors of unclassifie
d histology were the bad prognostic factors. Six months after radiotherapy
normalisation or improvement in hormonal hypersecretion and visual field an
d acuity deficits were 82 and 63%, respectively.
Conclusion: Tumors more than 4 cm in size may be more convenient for the de
finition of 'giant pituitary adenoma' when tumor control and PFS are taken
as the end points. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserv
ed.