Comparative effects of single intraperitoneal or oral doses of sodium arsenate or arsenic trioxide during in utero development

Citation
Dg. Stump et al., Comparative effects of single intraperitoneal or oral doses of sodium arsenate or arsenic trioxide during in utero development, TERATOLOGY, 60(5), 1999, pp. 283-291
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
TERATOLOGY
ISSN journal
00403709 → ACNP
Volume
60
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
283 - 291
Database
ISI
SICI code
0040-3709(199911)60:5<283:CEOSIO>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Numerous studies have suggested that single-day intraperitoneal (IP) inject ion of inorganic arsenic results in failure of neural tube closure and othe r malformations in rats, hamsters, and mice. Most of these studies involved treatment of limited numbers of animals with maternally toxic doses of ars enic (generally As-V), without defining a dose-response relationship. In th e present Good Laboratory Practice-compliant study, sodium arsenate (AsV) w as administered IP and arsenic trioxide (As-III) was administered either IP or orally (by gavage) on gestational day 9 to groups of 25 mated Crl:CD(R) (SD)BR rats. Only at dose levels that caused severe maternal toxicity, incl uding lethality, did IP injection of arsenic trioxide produce neural tube a nd ocular defects; oral administration of higher doses of arsenic trioxide caused some maternal deaths but no treatment-related fetal malformations. i n contrast, IP injection of similar amounts of sodium arsenate (based on th e molar amount of arsenic) caused mild maternal toxicity but a targe increa se in malformations, including neural tube, eye, and jaw defects. In summar y, neural tube and craniofacial defects were observed after IP injection of both AsV and As-III; however, no increase in malformations was seen follow ing oral administration of As-III, even at maternally lethal doses. These r esults demonstrate that the frequently cited association between prenatal e xposure to inorganic arsenic and malformations in laboratory animals is dep endent on a route of administration that is not appropriate for human risk assessment. (C) 1999 Wiley-Liss,Inc.