Objective-To test the hypothesis that proposed amendments to the Occupation
al Safety and Health Act making all enclosed workplaces in Western Australi
a smoke free would result in a decrease in cigarette consumption by patrons
at nightclubs, pubs, and restaurants without adversely affecting attendanc
e.
Design-Cross sectional structured interview survey.
Participants and setting-Patrons of several inner city pubs and nightclubs
in Perth were interviewed while queuing for admission to these venues.
Outcome measures-Current social habits, smoking habits, and how these might
be affected by the proposed regulations. Persons who did not smoke daily w
ere classified as "social smokers."
Results-Half (50%) of the 374 patrons interviewed were male, 51% currently
did not smoke at all, 34.3% smoked every day, and the remaining 15.7% smoke
d, brat not every day. A clear majority (62.5%) of all 374 respondents anti
cipated no change to the frequency of their patronage of hospitality venues
if smoke-free policies became mandatory One in five (19.3%) indicated that
they would,ao out more often, and 18.2% said they would go out less often.
Half (52%) of daily smokers anticipated no change to their cigarette consu
mption, while 44.5% of daily smokers anticipated a reduction in consumption
. A majority of social smokers (54%) predicted a reduction in their cigaret
te consumption, with 42% of these anticipating quitting.
Conclusions-One in nine (11.5%) of smokers say that adoption of smoke-Pi ee
policies would prompt them to quit smoking entirely without a significant
decrease in attendance at pubs and nightclubs. There can be few other initi
atives as simple, cheap, and popular that would achieve so much for public
health.