Bisphenol A (BPA) is a monomer used in the manufacture of a multitude of ch
emical products, including epoxy resins and polycarbonate. The objective of
this study was to evaluate the effects of BPA on male sexual development.
This study, performed in CF-1 mice, was limited to the measurement of sex-o
rgan weights, daily sperm production (DSP), epididymal sperm count, and tes
tis histopathology in the offspring of female mice exposed to low doses of
BPA (0, 0.2, 2, 20, or 200 mu g/kg/day), by deposition in the mouth on gest
ation days 11-17. Male sexual development determinations were made in offsp
ring at 90 days-of-age. Since this study was conducted to investigate and c
larify low-dose effects reported by S. C. Nagel et al., 1997, Environ. Heal
th Perspect. 105, 70-76, and F. S. vom Saal et at, 1998, Toxicol. Indust. H
ealth 14, 239-260, our study protocol purposely duplicated the referenced s
tudies for all factors indicated as critical by those investigators. An add
itional group was dosed orally with 0.2 mu g/kg/day of diethylstilbestrol (
DES), which was selected based on the maternal dose reported to have maximu
m effect on the prostate of developing offspring, by F. S. vom Saal (1996,
personal communication), vom Saal et al. (1997, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S
A 94, 2056-2061). Tocopherol-stripped corn oil was used as the vehicle for
BPA and DES, and was administered alone to control animals. No treatment-re
lated effects on clinical observations, body weight, or food consumption we
re observed in adult females administered any dose of BPA or DES. Similarly
, no treatment-related effects on growth or survival of offspring from dams
treated with BPA or DES were observed. The total number of pups born per l
itter Was slightly lower in the 200-mu g/kg/day BPA group when compared to
controls, but this change was not considered treatment-related since the li
tter size was within the normal range of historical controls. There were no
treatment-related effects of BPA or DES on testes histopathology, daily sp
erm production, or sperm count, or on prostate, preputial gland, seminal ve
sicle, or epididymis weights at doses previously reported to affect these o
rgans or at doses an order of magnitude higher or lower. In conclusion, und
er the conditions of this study, the effects of low doses of BPA reported b
y S. C. Nagel et al. 1997 (see above) and F. S. vom Saal et at, 1998 (see a
bove), or of DES reported by F. S. vom Saal ef al., 1997 (see above) were n
ot observed. The absence of adverse findings in the offspring of dams treat
ed orally with DES challenges the "low-dose hypothesis" of a special suscep
tibility of mammals exposed perinatally to ultra-low doses of even potent e
strogenic chemicals. Based on the data in the present study and the conside
rable body of literature on effects of EPA at similar and much higher doses
, BPA should not be considered as a selective reproductive or developmental
toxicant.