R. Fussl et al., Type and extent of vascular remodeling in significant coronary lesions: Anintravascular ultrasound study, Z KARDIOL, 88(10), 1999, pp. 780-787
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
The purpose of this study was to assess the dimension of regional vascular
remodeling and its influence on lumen narrowing in vivo. Sixty-three patien
ts with 68 coronary lesions were imaged by intravascular ultrasound before
transcatheter therapy. Quantitative measurements of lumen area, vessel area
, and plaque area were performed at the lesion site and at the proximal and
distal reference site. Area stenosis was calculated as plaque area/vessel
area . 100. The extent of remodeling was quantified by a remodeling index (
RI = stenosis vessel area mean reference vessel area/mean reference vessel
area 100). Additionally, three different groups of vascular remodeling were
defined: 1) positive remodeling = stenosis vessel area > maximal reference
vessel area; 2) intermediate remodeling = maximal reference vessel area 2
stenosis vessel area 2 minimal reference vessel area; 3) negative remodelin
g = stenosis vessel area < minimal reference vessel area. In 57% of lesions
stenosis vessel area was not inbetween the proximal and distal reference a
rea: 29% of lesions (20/68) had positive, 28% (19/68) negative, and 33% (29
/68) intermediate remodeling. Overall remodeling index averaged -0.8 +/- 19
.7%. In the negative remodeling group, reduction of vessel area contributed
to 40 +/- 21% of lumen narrowing, in the positive remodeling group, stenos
is vessel area was 21 +/- 12% enlarged (p < 0.001). Lesions with negative r
emodeling exhibit a lesser plaque area, lesions with positive remodeling a
larger than other vessels (8.2 +/- 2.4 mm(2), 13.8 +/- 3.7 mm(2), 10.8 +/-
3.7 mm(2); p < 0.001).
Distinct vascular remodeling occured in the majority of atheosclerotic lesi
ons and is a bidirectional process. Overall, the extent and the frequency o
f positive and negative remodeling was almost balanced. In lesions with neg
ative remodeling the plaque area was significantly lesser than in other les
ions.