B. Koentges et al., Incidence of invasive versus non-invasive carcinoma in comparing palpable and non-palpable solid breast lesions, ACT CHIR B, 99(5), 1999, pp. 245-248
A retrospective study was done of all patients with a suspicious mammograph
ic breast lesion surgically biopsied in our institution within the last 5 y
ears. Incidence of invasive versus non-invasive carcinoma and stage at pres
entation (according to TNM classification system) of palpable and non-palpa
ble lesions were compared. We found a significant difference of non-invasiv
e carcinoma in non-palpable and palpable cancers: 42.2% versus 4.3% (p < 0,
001).
Patients with a non-palpable invasive carcinoma presenting at stage I (i.e.
pT1 with no axillary metastasis) rated significantly higher compared to th
ose with palpable lesions 51.8% versus 9.4% (p < 0,001). The true positive
biopsy rate is 30%. As low as 10% has been considered reasonable. We have a
total of 56% carcinomas detected on all biopsies : 30% for non-palpable le
sions and 66.8% for palpable lesions.
A more aggressive approach towards screening and biopsy of breast lesions m
ight increase early detection of carcinoma and so improve survival.