Efficacy and economy of inhaled nitric oxide in neonates accepted for extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation

Authors
Citation
Pa. Lonnqvist, Efficacy and economy of inhaled nitric oxide in neonates accepted for extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation, ACT PHYSL S, 167(2), 1999, pp. 175-179
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Physiology
Journal title
ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
ISSN journal
00016772 → ACNP
Volume
167
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
175 - 179
Database
ISI
SICI code
0001-6772(199910)167:2<175:EAEOIN>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Objective: To study the clinical efficacy as well as the cost-effectiveness of inhaled nitric oxide (NO) compared with extra-corporeal membrane oxygen ation (ECMO) in neonates with pulmonary hypertension and hypoxic respirator y failure accepted for ECMO treatment. Design: Retrospective study of the first 10 consecutive neonatal patients t reated with inhaled NO during 1992-94. Inhaled NO was administered after fa ilure of conventional treatment as a last resort before initiating ECMO. Fo r cost-effectiveness calculations the above-described patient population wa s compared with ECMO patients having a very favourable ECMO course. Setting: Twelve-bed neonatal and paediatric intensive care unit with ECMO c apabilities at a tertiary university referral hospital. Results. Inhaled NO was found to significantly decrease the oxygenation index (OI pre-NO: medi an 80.5; OI post-NO. median 22.5; P = 0.003) and five of the patients could successfully be handled without the use of ECMO. ECMO was found to be more than four times as expensive as inhaled NO treatment on a per hour basis ( $244 vs. $53 per hour) and the net savings from being able to avoid ECMO in five patients was calculated to be $156 200. Conclusion: initiation of inhaled NO caused a significant improvement in ox ygenation index and reduced the need for ECMO by 50% in critically ill neon atal patients with hypoxic respiratory failure. Inhaled NO was also found t o compare very favourably with ECMO regarding cost-effectiveness ($53 vs. $ 244 per treatment hour).