Sd. Goldfarb et al., HMO direct costs and health care resource use after implementation of a monthly limit on sumatriptan, AM J HEAL S, 56(21), 1999, pp. 2206-2210
The health care casts and resource use of patients with migraine before and
after a quantity limit on sumatriptan was introduced in an HMO were compar
ed.
A longitudinal, retrospective review of a medical claims database and a pha
rmacy claims database was conducted for two six-month periods before and af
ter a monthly limit (four tablets or injections) on sumatriptan reimburseme
nt was instituted at an independent practice association-model HMO in Febru
ary 1997. Patients with at least one medical claim with a diagnosis code fo
r migraine or at least two pharmacy claims for sumatriptan, methysergide, e
rgotamine, dihydroergotamine, or an ergotamine combination product in 1996
or 1997 were eligible for inclusion.
A total of 557 patients were included in the analysis. Migraine-related med
ical costs and total medical costs increased 1.5% and 24.4%, respectively;
neither change was statistically significant. Physician office visits relat
ed to migraine increased by 7.8%. The number of hospital admissions for the
cohort increased from three to five, but hospital costs decreased by 55.0%
. The overall costs of medications for migraine therapy decreased by 4.5%.
There was an 8.2% increase in prescriptions for drugs to treat migraine but
a 40.0% decrease in their cost, primarily because of decreased sumatriptan
use. There was a 33.9% increase in prescriptions for medications that coul
d be used as prophylaxis for migraine and a 49.6% increase in their cost.
Implementation of a monthly limit on sumatriptan decreased an HMO's pharmac
y costs but did not significantly alter migraine-related direct medical cos
ts and health care resource use of patients with migraine.