Comparison of intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups

Authors
Citation
Q. Nie et Jx. Lin, Comparison of intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups, AM J ORTHOD, 116(5), 1999, pp. 539-544
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS
ISSN journal
08895406 → ACNP
Volume
116
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
539 - 544
Database
ISI
SICI code
0889-5406(199911)116:5<539:COITSD>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a prevalent ten dency for intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies among different malocclus ion groups. This study consisted of 60 subjects who served as the normal oc clusion group and 300 patients divided into 5 malocclusion groups (ie, Clas s I with bimaxillary protrusion, Class II Division 1,Class II Division 2, C lass III, and Class III surgery). Tooth size measurements were performed on the models of normal occlusion and pretreatment models of patients by the Three Dimension Measuring Machine. Moreover, tooth size ratios, analyzed as described by Bolton and the Student t test showed no sexual dimorphism for these ratios in each of 6 groups, so the sexes were combined for each grou p. Then these ratios were compared among different malocclusion groups. The results showed no significant difference between subcategories of malocclu sion, so these groups were combined. There were now 120 cases in each of 3 categories: Class I, Class II, and Class III. A significant difference was found for all the ratios between the groups, the ratios showing that Class III > Class I > Class II. It demonstrated that intermaxillary tooth size di screpancy may be one of the important factors in the cause of malocclusions , especially in Class II and Class III malocclusions. Thus this study prove d the fact that Bolton analysis should be taken into consideration during o rthodontic diagnosis and therapy.