A comparative assessment of two reactive-transport models, PHREEQC and HYDR
OGEOCHEM (HGC), was done to determine the suitability of each for simulatin
g the movement of acidic contamination in alluvium. For simulations that ac
counted for aqueous complexation, precipitation and dissolution, the breakt
hrough and rinseout curves generated by each model were similar. The differ
ences in simulated equilibrium concentrations between models were minor and
were related to (1) different units in model output, (2) different activit
y coefficients, and (3) ionic-strength calculations. When adsorption proces
ses were added to the models, the rinseout pH simulated by PHREEQC using th
e diffuse double-layer adsorption model rose to a pH of 6 after pore volume
15, about 1 pore volume later than the pH simulated by HGC using the const
ant-capacitance model.
In PHREEQC simulation of a laboratory column experiment, the inability of t
he model to match measured outflow concentrations of selected constituents
was related to the evident lack of local geochemical equilibrium in the col
umn. The difference in timing and size of measured and simulated breakthrou
gh of selected constituents indicated that the redox and adsorption reactio
ns in the column occurred slowly when compared with the modeled reactions.
MINTEQA2 and PHREEQC simulations of the column experiment indicated that th
e number of surface sites that took part in adsorption reactions was less t
han that estimated from the measured concentration of Fe hydroxide in the a
lluvium. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.